Introduction
Farrow and Ball, renowned for its premium paint and exquisite colour palette, has been a staple in many high-end decorating projects. However, the professional painting community holds diverse opinions about the brand. This review synthesises feedback from painters and decorators to provide a comprehensive evaluation of Farrow and Ball paints, highlighting both commendations and criticisms.
Coverage and Application
One of the most recurrent criticisms of Farrow and Ball is its coverage. Many professionals report needing more coats than other brands to achieve a satisfactory finish. For instance, in one discussion, Peter Ward expressed frustration with patchy drying and streaky finishes despite using the recommended primer and proper tools. This sentiment is echoed by numerous decorators who find the paint requires three to four coats, especially for darker colours like Stiffkey Blue and Railings.
David Taylor and other professionals suggest a practical workaround: using a high-quality undercoat from another brand, then applying Farrow and Ball as a topcoat. This approach seems to mitigate some of the coverage issues and allows decorators to achieve the desired aesthetic with fewer coats. Additionally, certain decorators, like Joe Green, argue that issues with Farrow and Ball often stem from user error rather than the paint itself, suggesting that with proper technique and experience, the paint can perform well.
Durability and Finish
The finish of Farrow and Ball paints receives high praise from many in the decorating community. The unique, chalky matte finish of the Estate Emulsion and the rich depth of colour are frequently highlighted as major advantages. Professionals like Lisa James and Michael Turner commend the paint for its aesthetic appeal, noting that when applied correctly, it provides a superior, luxurious finish that clients adore.
However, the durability of the Estate Emulsion is often questioned. It is noted for marking easily and being difficult to clean, which can be problematic in high-traffic areas. On the other hand, the Modern Emulsion and Estate Eggshell are praised for their improved durability and suitability for more demanding environments. As noted by several decorators, these formulations seem to be more forgiving and robust, making them preferable for kitchens, bathrooms, and other areas subject to wear and tear.
Cost and Value
The high cost of Farrow and Ball is a significant point of contention. Many professionals feel that the premium price is not justified by the performance of the paint, especially considering the coverage issues. This sentiment is summarised by comments such as “overpriced rubbish” and comparisons to more cost-effective alternatives like Johnstone’s and Dulux Heritage, which are often cited as offering similar colours and finishes at a fraction of the cost.
Despite the high price, some decorators, like Andrew Barnes, believe that the unique finish and depth of colour justify the expense, particularly for clients seeking a specific, high-end look. Additionally, some professionals find that using Farrow and Ball as a topcoat over a more affordable base coat can balance the desire for luxury with practical cost considerations.
Formula Changes and Improvements
There is a general consensus that Farrow and Ball’s formula has improved over the years. Earlier criticisms focused heavily on poor coverage and application difficulties, but recent feedback suggests that newer formulations, particularly the Modern Emulsion, are easier to work with and more durable. This evolution is recognised by decorators who have used the brand consistently over the years, noting a positive change in the product’s performance.
Final Thoughts
Farrow and Ball paints remain a polarising topic among professional decorators. While the brand’s aesthetic qualities and unique finishes are widely appreciated, issues with coverage, durability, and cost continue to spark debate. For decorators willing to invest the time and technique required, Farrow and Ball can deliver exceptional results that justify its premium status. However, for those prioritising practicality and cost-effectiveness, alternative brands may offer a more suitable solution. The key to success with Farrow and Ball lies in understanding its specific requirements and managing client expectations accordingly.
